Sunday, October 25, 2009

Say Cheeeeeese…

On March 19th of this year, someone started an anonymous twitter account called “TOSunshineGirl”. The poster tweeted about the Sunshine Girl’s physical appearance - sometimes pointing out repulsive tattoos or observing bruises.

On September 2nd - after 311 tweets - the anonymous twitterer presumably decided to call it quits.

In honour of the TOSunshineGirl twitterer, I wanted to share an observation I made on a recent Sunshine Girl.

Friday’s Sunshine Girl Sarah was shafted by the Toronto Sun staff. The Sun is featuring an extremely unappealing photo of Sarah in the link to her Sunshine Girl video (See screenshot below).

It’s a shame too because she’s pretty cute in most of her other photos and in the video.

Sunshine

Here’s a more appropriate photo that the Sun editors should have chosen:

Sunshine2

Friday, October 16, 2009

More Sun Ignorance on Congestion

Gridlock

Photo by lynac

The Toronto Sun once again has proven its ignorance toward gridlock issues in Toronto. Mike Strobel’s column this morning argues that we should be timing our traffic lights to improve traffic flow but not for TTC vehicles or bicycles.

What Mr. Strobel fails to comprehend is that any modest improvement in traffic flow on Toronto’s streets will be met by an equal amount of new cars on the road. This is the same reason that adding more lanes to Toronto highways will only make gridlock worse.

It’s simple: the demand for roads will always exceed the capacity (in Toronto) - that is a reality.

Strobel refers to Hamilton’s timed lights working well to keep traffic flowing. Of course it works well in Hamilton because there are less cars. In Toronto there are millions of people who take the GO train, TTC or bike to work. At any given moment any of these people could easily jump in their car and take it to work – if traffic flow was improved.

This is simply not the case in Hamilton. Some day in the future Hamilton demand will exceed the capacity of road space, but until then timed lights will work well.

Furthermore, Strobel also fails to understand that timed traffic lights can only work on one-way streets. Toronto has very few one-way streets, so converting the two-way streets would be necessary to even make his suggestion possible. The last thing I’d want to see is King street or Queen street turn into a Richmond or Adelaide. It would remove all liveability from these streets.

This is the problem with simpleton media like the Toronto Sun. You can’t expect any kind of analysis from some of the writers – only emotional drivel. That’s why the Sun thinks there is a war on cars, but the truth is that investment in bicycle infrastructure and public transit is the only way to reduce gridlock.

You need to provide people an alternative to driving, otherwise our roads will always be over-capacity.

Sunday, October 4, 2009

Newspaper Gone Wrong

2009-10-04

Today’s Toronto Sun cover reads like a promotional brochure from a prominent multinational oil corporation. Bikes are bad, and investing in “Green” technology is fruitless.

In the “BIKE BLITZ” by-line, it reads “Cops crack down on rogue cyclists”. Rogue cyclists? Are you kidding me? 49 of the tickets to “rogue” cyclists were written for not having a working bell. Another 40 of those tickets were given to people without proper reflecting lights – that hardly sounds “rogue” to me.

In the main headline “GREEN GONE WRONG”, the conclusion of the article is that it’s not worth it to invest in solar panels. Never mind the environmental benefits that you get from producing solar energy, if there is no economic benefit then people shouldn’t invest.

It’s comical that the Toronto Sun inserts disclaimers into articles just to make an outrageous story. In this particular article the disclaimer reads: “Some of that, they acknowledge, has been their responsibility. They realize they've had trouble filling out some of their forms -- not knowing whether they were an embedded generator or a load customer. And Mary notes that when Peter gets excited his voice does tend to rise a bit.”

For every step forward we take, newspapers like the Toronto Sun put us two steps back. Good thing the only people who take this tabloid newspaper seriously are a small batch of right-wing nuts who are already hopelessly ignorant on the environmental issues of today.

Saturday, October 3, 2009

Slow News Day? Nope. Hot Chick.

2009-10-03

On September 17th we surmised that a raw photo of cleavage on the Toronto Sun cover page was the result of a slow news day.

Well it must be another slow news day. Or not. Perhaps a conversation took place in the newsroom this morning:

Newsroom Employee: “Slow News day?”

Newsroom Editor: “Nope. Hot chick”

Newsroom Employee: “Oh, good point”

And so another day goes by in the newsroom of the Toronto Sun. Free advertising for Facebook (again) and a little bit of cleavage. That’s how newspapers are sold in 2009.

Sandra’s Photo Op

2009-10-01

On Thursday’s Toronto Sun cover, the Sun tried to make a news story about Councillor Sandra Bussin’s phone call into John Tory’s radio show where she only identified herself as “Sandra from Toronto”.

Bussen defended outgoing Mayor David Miller but when asked repeatedly by John Tory if she works for the city, she responded “no”.

Is this seriously front page newsworthy? She called the radio station to defend the Mayor. Who cares if she wasn’t forthcoming that she’s a Councillor? Councillors are human and they are also citizens of the City of Toronto. She has every right to defend David Miller.

However, if I were her I’d be more pissed off about the photo they published on the cover than the article itself.

It seriously looks like the photo was taken while she was in the middle of a number two. Poor Sandra.

Thursday, October 1, 2009

What about HIS GONER?

2009-09-26

Yesterday, an anonymous Toronto Sun Sucks commenter pointed out the bizarre headline on the September 26th Toronto Sun cover – printed the day after Mayor David Miller announced that he wouldn’t seek re-election next year.

The cover reads “HIS GONER”. The commenter mockingly ponders “What about his goner? Is there something  wrong with his goner? Did you mean “HE’S A GONER”? Because that’s not what you wrote down on the FRONT PAGE OF YOUR NEWSPAPER.”

Toronto Sun Sucks shares this reader’s viewpoint on the September 26th cover. I spent a fair portion of my day on Saturday wondering why on earth they would choose such a poor headline that wouldn’t make sense to the average person.

Let me explain though why the Sun went with this headline. You see, the Toronto Sun has a kennel in their basement where they keep a rabid canine that goes by the alias “Sue-Ann Levy”. When the Sun doesn’t feed her properly, she becomes very hostile and mean.

Levy commonly refers to the Mayor as “HIS BLONDNESS” in her articles. The September 26th headline was a poorly-conceived reference to HIS BLONDNESS. Now that Miller won’t be seeking re-election, the Sun is referring to him as “HIS GONER” (updated: rhyming with “His Honour” as pointed out by our readers). I know, I know - even with the explanation it’s still a silly headline.

But would you expect anything different from the Toronto Sun?